Cases 41 - 50 of 187
Burke v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00953
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Grandview Family Practice, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Klosterman v. Sedamsville Community Development Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv00119
Defendant:
Lonnie Wise, Patricia A. Burke, Mayor John Cranley and others
Plaintiff:
John Klosterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merry X-Ray Corporation v. JDIS Group et al
as 1:2020cv00285
Defendant:
JDIS Group and Burke Whitney
Plaintiff:
Merry X-Ray Corporation and Merry X-Ray Corporation doing business as Universal Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Burks v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation in Corrections, et al
as 1:2020cv00093
Defendant:
Gov. Mike DeWine, Sgt Pitzen, C/O Christina Weaver and others
Plaintiff:
Jamual S. Burks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burk v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05624
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trevor J. Burk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burke v. Lokring Technology, LLC.
as 1:2019cv02961
Defendant:
Lokring Technology LLC and Lokring Technology, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Stephen Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Engler v. Burke et al
as 4:2019cv02943
Plaintiff:
David L. Engler
Defendant:
Dr. Burke, John Joseph Vargo, D.O., Mahoning County, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burks et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05014
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Burks and Brandy Burks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burks v. Tomo Hibachi Restaurant and Lounge, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02652
Defendant:
Valentina Lucic, Tomo Hibachi Restaurant and Lounge, LLC and Velimir Lucic
Plaintiff:
Chrishana Burks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burks v. USA
as 1:2019cv02581
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Brittney E. Burks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
