Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Ware v. Fastrucking.Com, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01304
Plaintiff:
Victor Ware
Defendant:
Fastrucking.Com, LLC, Barrett Business Services, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00562
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02772
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Torres et al v. DGA Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv05734
Plaintiff:
Merced Torres and Simon Zuniga
Defendant:
DGA Services, Inc. and Barrett Business Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gerardo Ayala v. Destination Shuttle Services LLC et al
as 2:2013cv06141
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Ayala
Defendant:
Barrett Business Services Inc, Destination Shuttle Services LLC and Does
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00949
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00735
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
California Shock Trauma v. State Compensation Insurance, et al
as 2:2009cv00090
Defendant:
Truck Insurance Exchange, City of Watsonville, FirstComp Underwriters Group and others
Amicus Curiae:
Med Trans Corporation, Air Methods Corporation, California Association of Air Medical Services and others
Plaintiff:
California Shock Trauma Air Rescue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
California Shock Trauma Air Re v. State Compensation Insurance F, et al
as 09-16810
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC., CITY OF WATSONVILLE, LAKE VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA SHOCK TRAUMA AIR RESCUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
