Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Squitieri et al v. Nocco et al
as 8:2019cv00906
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Squitieri, Anthony Pearn, John Horning and others
Defendant:
Taffini Reed, Jeffery Harrington, Kenneth Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bynum Transport, Inc. v. Navistar, Inc.
as 8:2019cv00731
Plaintiff:
Bynum Transport, Inc.
Defendant:
Navistar, Inc. and Cummins Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bynum v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv23142
Plaintiff:
Ricky Nelson Bynum
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Southern Press and Packing, Inc. v. Nexus Produce, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv14489
Plaintiff:
Southern Press and Packing, Inc.
Defendant:
Nexus Produce, Inc., Kevin Bynum and Julio Ortuzar
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0499
Bynum Transport, Inc. v. Navistar, Inc.
as 8:2016cv03009
Plaintiff:
Bynum Transport, Inc.
Defendant:
Navistar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reese v. Gooding et al
as 3:2015cv00521
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Reese
Defendant:
David M. Gooding, Jeffrey Lawrence Barrett, Virginia Norton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friedler v. Corizon Correctional Healthcare Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00226
Plaintiff:
Robert Ryan Friedler
Defendant:
Corizon Correctional Healthcare, Mike Scott, Scott A. Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYNUM v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2012cv01043
Respondent:
State of Florida
Petitioner:
ALRAH BYNUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BYNUM v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2012cv00210
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
ALRAH BYNUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noble, Shekhem, Daawuud El Amen Ra Bey v. Zurich North America et al
as 6:2011cv01429
Plaintiff:
Noble, Shekhem, Daawuud El Amen Ra Bey
Defendant:
Zurich North America, MCI Worldcom, Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
