Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Freeman v. Sgt. Sawyer et al
as 2:2010cv14272
Plaintiff:
Damien D. Freeman
Defendant:
Sgt. Sawyer, C.O. Queen and C.O. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Everglades Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2010cv00615
Petitioner:
Gregory Virgil Williams
Respondent:
Everglades Correctional Institution, Catherine Williams, Columbia Correctional Institution Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hannah v. Hodson et al
as 3:2010cv00674
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
C.O. Hodson, C.O. Newell, C.T. Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Laux et al
as 2:2010cv00438
Plaintiff:
LeSamuel Palmer
Defendant:
T. Laux, C.O. Reineck, T. Giliberto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tomblin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00309
Plaintiff:
Charles Franklin Tomblin
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Warden Hicks, Corrections Officer Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bilal v. Ellis et al
as 2:2010cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Ali Bilal
Defendant:
Captain Ellis, Lt. Walls, A. Burroughs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caison v. Reddish et al
as 3:2009cv01025
Plaintiff:
Norman E. Caison
Defendant:
B. Reddish, S. T. Robinson, Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hannah v. Griffis, et al.
as 3:2009cv00923
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
C.O. Hodson, C.O. Woods, C.O. Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrett v. C.O. Aguirri et al
as 6:2009cv01100
Plaintiff:
Tracy Garrett
Defendant:
C.O. Aguirri, C.O. Cook, C.O. Grimaldo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila v. Aultman et al
as 3:2009cv00329
Plaintiff:
Felipe Alfonso Avila
Defendant:
Sgt. Aultman and C.O. Hart
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
