Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Davis v. Delmarva Collection, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00070
Plaintiff:
Catherine Davis
Defendant:
Delmarva Collection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Davis v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Incorporated
as 5:2007cv15234
Plaintiff:
Catherine Davis
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davis v. R & R Professionel Recovery, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02772
Plaintiff:
Catherine Davis
Defendant:
R & R Professionel Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davis v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02773
Plaintiff:
Catherine Davis
Defendant:
NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ADAMS et al v.A.C.AND S.INC.,ET AL
as 2:2007cv66352
Plaintiff:
DENNIS C. ADAMS, REBECCA A. ALEXANDER, AARON ALLEN and others
Defendant:
MELISSA LOUELLA BARRON, A C AND S, INC., A.P. INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
