Cases 41 - 50 of 270
Barnes v. New Mexico Department of Corrections
as 1:2020cv00935
Plaintiff:
Charles D.J. Barnes
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland et al v. Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv00928
Plaintiff:
Tucumcari Quality Inn and Suites NM 146, Charles Holland, Peggie Holland and others
Defendant:
Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Safetree Consulting et al v. Adams
as 1:2020mc00025
Petitioner:
Safetree Consulting and Damon Charles Williams
Respondent:
Matthew Patrick Adams
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Kiser et al v. Air Methods Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00801
Plaintiff:
Christian McClain and Charles Kiser
Defendant:
Air Methods Corporation and Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atcitty v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00515
Plaintiff:
Charles James Atcitty
Defendant:
USA and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Robinson v. Vigil et al
as 1:2020cv00352
Defendant:
FNU Summit, FNU LNU, City of Albuquerque and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Jermain Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto et al v. Governor of the State of New Mexico, et al
as 1:2020cv00317
Petitioner:
Patrick Hopkins, Dainte D Sanders, Jonathan Duran and others
Respondent:
Governor of the State of New Mexico and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Hatch
as 1:2020cv00242
Petitioner:
Charles B Jackson
Respondent:
Timothy Hatch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
