Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Littlejohn v. Owens et al
as 1:2021cv03169
Petitioner:
Timothy Littlejohn
Respondent:
Craig Owens, Flynn Broady, Chief Leonard, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
Williams v. GA et al
as 1:2021cv02265
Defendant:
Chris Carr and GA
Plaintiff:
Dawn Michelle Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Carr
as 1:2021cv01474
Petitioner:
Lord Keith L. Ferguson
Respondent:
Chris Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lodge v. Hale et al
as 1:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Sandra C. DeShaizer, Merv Waldrop, Katrana Luellen and others
Plaintiff:
Khamani Lodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El et al v. Arman 13, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00222
Defendant:
Fred C. Eady doing business as Executive Administrator for State Court of Fulton County, Lenora Ponzo doing business as Administrative Clerk for State Court of Fulton County, Chris Carr Attorney General for the State of Georgia doing business as Attorney General for the State of Georgia, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hezekiah Montia El and Muriel Montia El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lodge v. Hale et al
as 2:2020cv00114
Defendant:
Sandra C. DeShaizer, Merv Waldrop, Katrana Luellen and others
Plaintiff:
Khamani Lodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. Langley et al
as 3:2020cv00150
Plaintiff:
Lee W. Daniel
Defendant:
Terry Langley and Chris Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levin v. Upton, Sr. et al
as 1:2020cv03084
Respondent:
Warden Steve Upton, Sr. and Chris Carr
Petitioner:
Gregory Alan Levin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Swann v. Carr, et al.
as 3:2020cv00127
Defendant:
Chris Carr and Sheriff Terry Langley
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Swann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
