Cases 41 - 50 of 116
Conner v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv02126
Plaintiff:
Larry Vince Conner
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harper v. Cavalry SPV I, LLC et al (JRG1)
as 2:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E Harper
Defendant:
Cavalry SPV I, LLC, Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC and Garner & Conner, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gates v. Private Mortgage Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv02124
Plaintiff:
Amy Gates
Defendant:
Garner & Conner, PLLC and Private Mortgage Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Conner et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Larry S Conner and Linda J Conner
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Ortho, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marshall et al v. ESPN Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01945
Plaintiff:
Javon Marshall , Steven Clarke , Chris Conner and others
Defendant:
ESPN Inc. , CBS Broadcasting, Inc. , National Broadcasting Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davenport v. Cavalry SPV I, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00241
Plaintiff:
Inez T Davenport
Defendant:
Cavalry SPV I, LLC, Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC and Garner & Conner, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller v. Troy Capital, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
Anne Miller
Defendant:
Troy Capital, LLC and Garner & Conner, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Conner v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2014cv00161
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Conner
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee , Monte Manka and Brian Lockhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Cavalry SPV II, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00177
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jones
Defendant:
Cavalry SPV II, LLC, Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC and Garner & Conner, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
