Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Maria Carbajal et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01819
Plaintiff:
Viola Allen, Linda Asberry, Anita Berry and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
Zurita Gray et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01862
Plaintiff:
Nita Baker, Wanda Bingham, Znobbie Bishop and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Mary Adamian et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01899
Plaintiff:
Mary Adamian, Soraya Azad, Linda Baraz and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
Petitioner:
Marlene Easterling
Hunter v. Perez et al
as 1:2014cv00313
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dewitt Hunter
Defendant:
Leticia Perez, Mike Maggarl, David Couch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Kern Medical Center et al
as 1:2014cv00265
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dewitt Hunter
Defendant:
Kern Medical Center, Kern County Board of Supervisors, Leticia Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couch
as 1:2014at00003
Plaintiff:
David Couch
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Couch v. Morgan Stanley & Co, Inc., et al.
as 1:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
David Couch
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Charles Samuel Couch v. City of Manhattan Beach et al
as 2:2013cv07554
Defendant:
Det Michael Allard, Sgt. B Brown, City of Manhattan Beach and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Samuel Couch
Manning, et al., v. CDCR, et al.,
as 2:2012at01285
Plaintiff:
Sherman D. Manning and Peter Andrist
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, T. Virga, J. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manning, et al., v. CDCR, et al.,
as 2:2012cv02440
Plaintiff:
Sherman D. Manning and Peter Andrist
Defendant:
L. Johnson, R. Couch, Humphries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
