Cases 41 - 50 of 197
Hofschneider et al v. Torres et al
as 1:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Attorney General Edward E. Manibusan, Governor Ralph DLG Torres, Ph.D. Michael F. Dega and others
Plaintiff:
Richard U. Hofschneider and Liana S. Hofschneider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dimitar Dermendziev v. Robert Herzog, et al
as 20-35713
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK D. LEIGH, CUS I Unit, former, CRCC, GINA PENROSE, Associate Superintendent, former, CRCC, G. CHRIS HICKS, H Unit CUS, former, CRCC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIMITAR DERMENDZIEV
Michelle Gable v. WCCW, et al
as 20-35548
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL CLARK, HSM/ADA Coordinator, ADAM PERKINS, HSM, MR. SHULZE, CUS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE C. GABLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kier Gardner v. Brown, et al
as 20-35300
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIER KEAND'E GARDNER, AKA Chris Gardner
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON STATE, Department 1, K. WALKER, CS2-Grievance Coordinator of WSP, in official an individual capacity, BROWN, #7338 Officer, Booth/Floor Officer of WSP-Main-Fox Unit, in official and individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02304
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv60118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pham et al v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00122
Plaintiff:
Calvin Huynh and Cu Pham
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13781
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
