Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 74
In Re: Lehman Brothers Securit
as 13-156
Plaintiff: Locals 302 & 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers - Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust, City of South San Francisco, City of Long Beach and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Rena Caldwell, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Glen Deathrow, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Madeline Dimodica, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Consolidated-Defendant: ABN AMRO Holding N.V., BBVA Securities Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC and others
Defendant: BNY Capital Markets, Inc., DZ Financial Markets LLC, Jerry A. Grundhofer and others
Defendant - Appellee: Roger S. Berlind, A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC and others
Intervenor: Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System and Joseph Humble
Lucio Barroga v. Board of Administration of Cal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-15084
Plaintiff - Appellant: LUCIO A. BARROGA
Defendant - Appellee: BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, PERS
Type: Contract Insurance
Montana Board of Investments et al
as 1:2012cv08379
Plaintiff: Montana Board of Investments , Teacher Retirement System of Texas , California Public Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant: Pfizer Inc, Henry A. McKinnell, John L. LaMattina and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Kia v. The California Public Employees' Retirement System et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv05317
Plaintiff: Laila Kia
Defendant: The California Public Employees' Retirement System and Rahim Kia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Michael Dragovich, et al v. United States Department of th, et al
as 12-16628
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL DRAGOVICH, MICHAEL GAITLEY, ELIZABETH LITTERAL and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Secretary of the Treasury, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Defendant: BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and ANNE STAUSBOLL, Chief Executive Officer, CalPERS
Intervenor-Defendant: BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Michael Dragovich, et al v. US Department of the Treasury, et al
as 12-16461
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL DRAGOVICH, MICHAEL GAITLEY, ELIZABETH LITTERAL and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Secretary of the Treasury, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Cortlandt Street Recovery Corp v. California State Teachers Retirement System et al
as 2:2011cv10571
Defendant: California Public Employees Retirement System, California State Teachers Retirement System, Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System and others
Plaintiff: Cortlandt Street Recovery Corp
Cortlandt Street Recovery Corp v. Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System et al
as 2:2011cv10573
Defendant: California Public Employees Retirement System, California State Teachers Retirement System, Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System and others
Plaintiff: Cortlandt Street Recovery Corp
Richard Lane v. Anne Stausboll, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-16268
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD R. LANE
Defendant - Appellee: ANNE STAUSBOLL, CEO and ROB FECKNER, President of the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS)
The California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Fuld et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01281
Plaintiff: The California Public Employees' Retirement System
Defendant: Richard S. Fuld, Jr., Christopher M. O'Meara, Erin M. Callan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?