Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Commerce Bank, a division of Berkshire Bank v. First State Trucking, Inc.
as 4:2018cv40159
Defendant:
Timothy J. Campbell, Donald H. Campbell and First State Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Commerce Bank, a division of Berkshire Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Landmark School Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11933
Defendant:
Does 1-5, Charles Harris, Archibald Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2018cv11853
Plaintiff:
Susan Campbell and Ray Franklin Campbell
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Howland et al
as 1:2018cv11195
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Defendant:
John Howland, Jr., Anatasia G. French, Sheridan French and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
CAMPBELL v. URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.,
as 1:2017cv11935
Plaintiff:
DARREN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Campbell v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv30110
Plaintiff:
Eileen Patricia Campbell
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Campbell v. Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Health et al
as 1:2017cv11134
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Campbell
Defendant:
Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Health, Thomas Grobleski, Rebecca Lubelcyzk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp et al
as 1:2017cv10899
Plaintiff:
David Campbell and Glenda Campbell
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp , Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv10800
Plaintiff:
Jonathan P Campbell
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
