Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Cooke v. Wood et al
as 1:2011cv00984
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven P. Wood, Diane C. Walsh, Paul R. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swan v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00847
Petitioner:
Ralph E. Swan
Respondent:
Carl C. Danberg and Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Biggins v. Green
as 11-3427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN, Sergeant, KIESSER, TELB and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CANDY DIBBLE
Cabrera v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00784
Petitioner:
Luis Cabrera
Respondent:
Carl C. Danberg and Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Jackson, III v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 11-9002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT W. JACKSON, III
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS L. CARROLL, Warden Delaware Correctional Center, CARL C. DANBERG, PAUL HOWARD, Bureau Chief Delaware Bureau of Prisons and others
Robert Jackson, III v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 11-9000
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT W. JACKSON, III
Defendant - Appellant:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner, Delaware Department of Correction, THOMAS L. CARROLL, Warden Delaware Correctional Center, PAUL HOWARD, Bureau Chief, Delaware Bureau of Prisons and others
Valentine v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00524
Plaintiff:
Anthony Valentine
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Perry Phelps and Mike Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Green, Kiesser, Telb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Gile et al
as 1:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
George Gile, Mark D. Daum, Marcili Rispoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sylvester Shockley v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 11-1897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYLVESTER SHOCKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of Corrections, RICK KEARNEY, Bureau Chief, PERRY PHELPS, Warden of James T. Vaughn Correctional Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
