Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Carter v. Davenport
as 2:2015cv00234
Petitioner:
Frank James Carter
Respondent:
Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Felder v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
Timothy Terrell Felder
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Carter Davenport and Officer Keeton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Davenport et al
as 2:2015cv00734
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Stokes
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hendrix v. Davenport et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00247
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Hendrix
Defendant:
Carter Davenport , Warden Carter , Captain Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Davenport et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00216
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Stokes
Defendant:
Carter Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Youngblood v. Alabama Department of Corrections, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00214
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Youngblood
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections , Carter Davenport , Warden Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Davenport et al
as 4:2015cv00432
Petitioner:
Steven Robinson
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrison v. St Clair Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2015cv00264
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harrison
Defendant:
St Clair Correctional Facility, Carter Davenport, Karen Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beason v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv01983
Petitioner:
Joseph M Beason
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cheatham et al v. Thomas et al
as 4:2014cv01952
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cheatham , Mark Duke , James Edwards and others
Defendant:
Kim Thomas , James Deloach , Terrance McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
