Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2016cv01403
Defendant:
Robyn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Teeters et al v. Volkswagen Group Of America Inc.
as 3:2016cv00993
Plaintiff:
Casey Teeters and Tiana Teeters
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wells v. Nass et al
as 2:2016cv00582
Defendant:
Roybn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Casey Dineen
as 3:2016ad00085
In Re:
Daniel Casey Dineen
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 2:2016cv00423
Defendant:
Neil F. Byl, Michael Casey, C. Criswell and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conway v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 1:2016cv00308
Defendant:
Justin Casey, Pat Conneville, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jordan Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Conway v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2016cv00308
Defendant:
Justin Casey, Pat Conneville, John #1 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jordan Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01849
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mayer v. USA
as 6:2015cv01826
Petitioner:
Casey Dale Mayer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
