Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. HOLDER
as 1:2010cv02005
Petitioner:
REGINALD CHANDLER
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER and HARLEY LAPPINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHANDLER et al v. JONES et al
as 1:2010cv00903
Plaintiff:
AARON D. P. CHANDLER , DAVID M. T. CHANDLER and RAYMOND HAMILTON
Defendant:
GREGORY JONES, ANDERSON, BRIAN T. HOLLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARROYO GRANDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2009cv01441
Plaintiff:
ARROYO GRANDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651 Medical Care Recovery
RUSSELL et al v. VILSACK
as 1:2009cv01323
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE RUSSELL, JOE LOUIS JOHNSON, LEROY BAKER and others
Defendant:
TOM VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv02146
Plaintiff:
ABDULLAH BROWN
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, FEDERAL CORRECTION INSTITUTION, RODNEY CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CHANDLER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2008cv01158
Plaintiff:
AARON D.P. CHANDLER
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, GREGORY JONES and UNKNOWN OFFICERS DOES 1-7
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CHANDLER, SR. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2007mc00536
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, D. SAUERS and others
Cause Of Action: Motion for Reconsideration of Court Ruling
CHANDLER v. UNITY HEALTH CARE, INC.
as 1:2007cv02010
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR.
Defendant:
UNITY HEALTH CARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
