Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Abrams et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01346
Plaintiff:
Robert C Abrams, Jr. , Sonya M Abrams , James M Allen and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
COBB v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01508
Petitioner:
DERRICK COBB
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
COBB-HAYE v. MACLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2015cv04278
Plaintiff:
ROBIN COBB-HAYE
Defendant:
MS. MACLAUGHLIN, LINDA RENICK, ROBERT DAYTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COBB v. WEIGHKNECHT
as 5:2015cv04246
Plaintiff:
ROBIN COBB
Defendant:
SARAH WEIGHKNECHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BISHOP v. COBB COUNTY et al
as 2:2015cv03065
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BISHOP
Defendant:
COBB COUNTY, J.M. BYRUM, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WORTHINGTON ASSOCIATES UNIT B OWNER, L.P. v. COBB THEATRES IV, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02887
Plaintiff:
WORTHINGTON ASSOCIATES UNIT B OWNER, L.P.
Defendant:
COBB THEATRES IV, LLC and COBB THEATRES III, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COBB THEATRES IV, LLC v. WORTHINGTON ASSOCIATES UNIT B OWNER, L.P.
as 2:2015cv02878
Plaintiff:
COBB THEATRES IV, LLC
Defendant:
WORTHINGTON ASSOCIATES UNIT B OWNER, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Prison Legal News et al v. Kane et al
as 1:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News , Daniel Denvir , Philadelphia City Paper and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Kane and R. Seth Williams
Amicu:
Amy B Ginensky and Eli M. Segal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBB v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv05263
Plaintiff:
AMANDA COBB
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
TRICOME v. EBAY, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv02492
Plaintiff:
DOMENIC TRICOME
Defendant:
EBAY, INC., SEAN CHAFFIN, WILLIAM COBB and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
