Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Jackson v. Corbin et al
as 1:2012cv09370
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman Jackson
Defendant:
Ozzie Corbin, Margaret Corbin, Collette Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Norman v. American Express Three World Financial et al
as 1:2012cv09152
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman
Defendant:
American Express Three World Financial, American Express Travel Cheques, United States Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jackson v. Norman et al
as 1:2012cv08132
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman Jackson
Defendant:
Boeca Norman, Rhoda Patnettll, Gays Corbelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v. Murphy et al
as 1:2012cv06117
Plaintiff:
Demaine Jackson
Defendant:
S. Murphy, Kelly, Malark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Rock et al
as 9:2012cv01248
Plaintiff:
Paul Smith
Defendant:
D. Rock, Santamore, Timothy Debyah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Corbin et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02305
Plaintiff:
Samantha Corbin and Robin Wilson
Defendant:
The City of New York , Alan Schlissel, Christopher McCormack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernsen v. Parker Waichman Alonso, LLP
as 1:2012mc00093
Plaintiff:
Corbin Bernsen
Defendant:
Parker Waichman Alonso, LLP
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Norman v. Norman Bangura Smith et al
as 1:2012cv01506
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman
Defendant:
Boenca Norman Bangura Smith, Pearl Jackson-Corbin Smith, Rhoda Norman-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
