Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Kelley v. Moja et al
as 3:2016cv00704
Plaintiff:
Antoine L. Kelley
Defendant:
Motsumi Moja, Correct Care Solutions, Corizon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saub v. Correct Care Solutions
as 3:2016cv00407
Plaintiff:
Eric B. Saub
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00279
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Murray
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC and Paul Stairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lambert v. Riverside Regional Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00478
Plaintiff:
Rauseff M. Lambert
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail, Correct Care Solutions and Officer Baines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart Northcraft vs. David Simmons, et al
as 1:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Stuart Northcraft
Defendant:
David Simons, Correct Care Solutions, Hampton Roads Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. Virginia Beach City Jail et al
as 1:2015cv00885
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alexander Wilder
Defendant:
Virginia Beach City Jail, Ken Stolle and Correct Care Solutions (CCS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker, Sr. v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2015cv00800
Plaintiff:
Howard D. Baker, Sr.
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, P. Smith, Alex Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeiuLio v. Virginia Beach Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2015cv00260
Plaintiff:
Adam M. DeiuLio
Defendant:
Virginia Beach Sheriff's Office, Correct Care Solutions and Dr. Jamaludeen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Woody et al
as 3:2015cv00355
Plaintiff:
Virginia Paige Jenkins
Defendant:
C. T. Woody , E. Beaver, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 1:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Clifton Reece
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution, Nurse Wise and Major Flippin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
