Cases 41 - 50 of 236
Jackson v. Acevedo et al
as 9:2020cv01092
Defendant:
Lieutenant Jhon Cannars, C.O. P. Bailey, C.O. Jhon Acevedo and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuchinsky v. Curry, Jr.
as 1:2020cv07081
Plaintiff:
David B. Kuchinsky
Defendant:
Eddy A. Curry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc
Curry v. Cassidy's Transfer and Storage Limited et al
as 1:2020cv01509
Plaintiff:
Redina L. Curry
Defendant:
John J. Quinn, Cassidy's Transfer and Storage Limited d/b/a Cassidy's and Cassidy's Transfer and Storage Limited doing business as Cassidy's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Curry v. Cassidy's Transfer and Storage Limited et al
as 6:2020cv06864
Plaintiff:
Redina L. Curry
Defendant:
John J. Quinn and Cassidy's Transfer and Storage Limited doing business as Cassidy's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Curry et al v. P&G Auditors and Consultants, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv06985
Defendant:
PGX, LLC, P&G AUDITORS AND CONSULTANTS, LLC, APPLE BANCORP, INC. d/b/a APPLE BANK FOR SAVINGS and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Mazzitelli, Jacqueline Brown Pilgrim and Kenneth Curry
Cross Claimant:
Apple Bancorp, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jackson v. Acevedo et al
as 7:2020cv06655
Defendant:
Lieutenant Jhon Cannars, C.O. P. Bailey, C.O. Jhon Acevedo and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jackson and Thomas Eli Jah Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv03305
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Curry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2020cv05889
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Brenda Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Curry v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv05039
Plaintiff:
Hennison Curry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
