Cases 41 - 50 of 50
JOHNSON v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv57852
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L JOHNSON
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2010cv41442
Defendant:
CURTIS L. JOHNSON and A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JOHNSON v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32611
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JOHNSON et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv84171
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LAROY JOHNSON, CURTIS LAROY JOHNSON, DELILAH L. JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Baynes et al
as 3:2009cv00290
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Baynes, Lynn B. Baynes, Curtis C. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
JOHNSON et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv83566
Plaintiff:
CURTIS E. JOHNSON, SR. and EVA JANE JOHNSON
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Curtis E. Johnson, Sr., et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al
as NCW/1:08-CV-00213
Plaintiff:
Curtis E. Johnson, Sr
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Johnson, Sr. et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00213
Plaintiff:
Curtis E. Johnson, Sr. and Eva Jane Johnson
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02376
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
JOHNSON v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv60397
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ALLISON JOHNSON
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
