Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Garner v. Gutierrez, Jr et al
as 2:2011cv00320
Plaintiff:
Willi Free I Garner
Defendant:
Ernest Gutierrez, Jr, Robert Crites, Norris D Jackson and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kidd v. Ginsel et al
as 9:2011cv00115
Plaintiff:
Carlos Kidd
Defendant:
Cody Ginsel, G. Currie, S Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kidd v. Thaler et al
as 9:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Carlos Kidd
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Ralph Bales, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Catlin Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2010cv00654
Plaintiff:
Georgia Jackson , Gwendolyn Jackson , Barbara Walker and others
Defendant:
Catlin Specialty Insurance Company , Engle Martin & Associates, Inc. and James C Woodard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. Catlin Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 4:2010cv04683
Plaintiff:
Georgia Jackson , Gwendolyn Jackson , Barbara Walker and others
Defendant:
Catlin Specialty Insurance Company , Engle Martin & Associates, Inc. and James C Woodard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Miller et al
as 9:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Williams
Defendant:
Steven T Miller, Sephen D Bryant, Kevin Belt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv00150
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Samuel D Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Medina v. Crites et al
as 2:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jacob Medina
Defendant:
Richard L. Crites, Jr. and Norris D Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. Gutierrez
as 2:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
Allen Beasley
Defendant:
E H Gutierrez, Norris D Jackson, Richard L Crites and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
