Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Maryland Casualty Company et al v. Dublin Eye Associates, P.C. et al
as 3:2015cv00081
Plaintiff:
Maryland Casualty Company and Foremost Signature Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dublin Eye Associates, P.C., Roger D. Smith and James Y. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Smith v. USA
as 1:2015cv01432
Petitioner:
Philip D. Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hussein v. Annett Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01366
Plaintiff:
Dawit Hussein
Defendant:
Annett Holdings, Inc. , Hudson Insurance Agency, Inc. and Scott D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PNC Bank, National Association v. Smith et al
as 1:2014cv03368
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Kenneth D. Smith, William R. Dooley, Terry W. Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heard et al v. Deal et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Doug Collins, G.B.I. Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. G.B.I. Director et al
as 2:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
G.B.I. Director, F.B.I. Director, Keith Albertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Girardeau et al
as 2:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
John Girardeau, Richard Story, J. D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. GBI Director et al
as 2:2014cv00110
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
GBI Director, Calloway, FBI Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Citi Mortgage et al
as 1:2013cv02537
Plaintiff:
Reginald D. Smith and Michelle Jones
Defendant:
Citi Mortgage , Pendergast & Associates, P.C. , McCalla Raymer LLC and others
Peterson v. Smith
as 1:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles Peterson
Defendant:
Eric D. Smith
Counter_claimant:
Eric D. Smith
Counter_defendant:
Charles Peterson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
