Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Smith v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2016ct03196
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Bryan K. Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wells et al
as 5:2016ct03180
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
Bryan Wells, Officer Pridgen and Officer Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler et al v. Anchor Steam Power Co., Inc. Defined Benefit Plan et al
as 1:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Ricky D. Chandler , Michael K. Grant , David M. Smith and others
Defendant:
Anchor Steam Power Co., Inc. Defined Benefit Plan, Anchor Steam Power Co., Inc. and John W. Row, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015ct03172
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America, James C. Fox, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2015hc02128
Petitioner:
David Lee Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conley et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2013ct03251
Plaintiff:
David Conley, David Lee Smith and Clarence E. Williams
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Roy A. Cooper, III, Nancy S. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faison et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2013ct03199
Plaintiff:
Moses Leon Faison, David Lee Smith, Thomas Franklin Cross, Jr. and others
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Quentin T. Sumner and Donald W. Overby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cooper
as 3:2013cv00073
Petitioner:
David L. Smith
Respondent:
Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. COOPER
as 1:2013cv00073
Petitioner:
DAVID L. SMITH
Respondent:
ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
David Earl Smith
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
