Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Chao v. Mello Creme, Inc., et al
as 3:2007cv01276
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao, Elaine L. Chao, Elaine L. Chao and others
Defendant:
Mello Creme, Inc., David Parks and Judy Parks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wood v. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03314
Plaintiff:
Judy Wood
Defendant:
Applied Research Associates, Inc., Science Applications International Corp., Boeing and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Civil Action for False Claims
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Organizational Trust et al v. Roofing Services Inc
as 2:2007cv00329
Plaintiff:
Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Organizational Trust, Jim Critchlow, Peter Fluetsch and others
Defendant:
Roofing Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Organizational Trust et al v. Lent Mechanical LLC
as 2:2007cv00330
Plaintiff:
Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Organizational Trust, Jim Critchlow, Peter Fluetsch and others
Defendant:
Lent Mechanical LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Organizational Trust et al v. Gloor
as 2:2007cv00056
Plaintiff:
Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Organizational Trust, Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Organizational Trust, Jim Critchlow and others
Defendant:
Tracie L Gloor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Palmer v. Globalive Communications Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv00038
Plaintiff:
Patrick Palmer
Defendant:
Globalive Communications Corp., Anthony Lacavera, David Parkes and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Richard Langer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
