Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Dawson v. Audet et al
as 1:2012cv00901
Plaintiff:
James Ralph Dawson, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul Audet, Susan Audet, Donald Brightwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
as 1:2012cv00389
Plaintiff:
Peter Dawson and Nancy Dawson
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawson et al v. U.S. Bank, National Association
as 1:2011cv02377
Plaintiff:
Clinton J. Dawson and Janell Dawson
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Dawson et al
as 1:2011cv02251
Plaintiff:
Shawn D. Allen
Defendant:
Judith Dawson , Judith (I) Dawson , Matt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abeyta et al v. CF&I Steel, L.P.
as 1:2011cv00663
Plaintiff:
Ralph Abeyta , Domingo Abraham , Martin Adakai and others
Defendant:
CF&I Steel, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Taxsalelists.com v. Rainer et al
as 1:2009cv02898
Plaintiff:
Taxsalelists.com
Defendant:
Matthew Rainer, Eva Rainer, Michael Rainer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 g Fraud & Related Matters in Connection w/ Computers
Dawson v. Earp et al
as 1:2009cv02819
Plaintiff:
James Ralph Dawson, Jr.
Defendant:
Earp, Gaylord, Cardova and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Gillis et al
as 1:2009cv02526
Plaintiff:
James Ralph Dawson, Jr.
Defendant:
James C. Gillis, D. Allen and Dale O'Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moghadamnia v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2009cv02102
Plaintiff:
Sharon Moghadamnia and Sharon Moghadamnia
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Maria Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
