Cases 41 - 50 of 141
Fields v. Director of CDCR et al
as 2:2018cv00653
Plaintiff:
Carlton Dwayne Fields
Defendant:
Director of CDCR, California Dept. of Corrections, Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll Tremaine v. State of California
as 2:2018cv01832
Respondent:
CDCR Chief Medical Officer, CDCR Contract Signed of Contract, CDCR Mental Health and others
Petitioner:
Carroll Tremaine
Hale v. Director of CDCR
as 3:2017cv02422
Petitioner:
Godoy A. Hale
Respondent:
Director of CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Warden et al
as 3:2017cv01998
Plaintiff:
Patrick Kelly
Defendant:
Warden, Director of CDCR, W.L. Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-56453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Office of the Governor, WILLIAM C. BEVERLY, Judge, the chief Law Officer, STEVEN R. YANSICKLEN, the successor in interest and others
Hammler v. Director of CDCR et al
as 2:2017cv01949
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Defendant:
Director of CDCR, Secretary of CDCR and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Edwards v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-55575
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR EDWARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Director of CDCR
Coleman v. Virga et al
as 2:2017cv00851
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Coleman
Defendant:
T. Virga, Jeff Macomber, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon Meador v. Director of CDCR
as 17-55315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GORDON DALE MEADOR
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF CDCR
Hammler v. Director of CDCR
as 1:2017cv00097
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Defendant:
Director of CDCR, Warden of SVSP, AW Of Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
