Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Bryson v. Credit Acceptance, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02713
Plaintiff:
James Bryson
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance, LLC and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyttenbach v. Parish et al
as 3:2012cv00386
Petitioner:
William Hayes Wyttenbach
Appellee:
Ranita Marie Parish
Respondent:
Texas Supreme Court, Court of Appeals 13th District of Texas, Banales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Heady v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jo Heady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steele v. Ethicon, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00241
Plaintiff:
Linda Steele
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc, Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sosa v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00732
Plaintiff:
Toni K. Sosa
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
Wanda Wells
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphree v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02630
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Murphree
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00731
Plaintiff:
Gloria M. Allen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00728
Plaintiff:
Jill Victoria Armstrong
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
