Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Bryson v. Credit Acceptance, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02713
Plaintiff:
James Bryson
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance, LLC and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyttenbach v. Parish et al
as 3:2012cv00386
Petitioner:
William Hayes Wyttenbach
Appellee:
Ranita Marie Parish
Respondent:
Texas Supreme Court, Court of Appeals 13th District of Texas, Banales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Chapman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Annette Chapman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyler v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00724
Plaintiff:
Nicole Denise Tyler
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhoads v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00725
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Juanita Rhoads
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Dell v. Ethicon et al
as 2:2012cv02632
Plaintiff:
Debbie O'Dell
Defendant:
Inc. Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
Cathy L. Alexander
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mize v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00077
Plaintiff:
Martha Faye Mize
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00733
Plaintiff:
Kara M. Hunter
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
