Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Sawyer v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00346
Defendant:
Roselle Donnelly, Dr. Kim Adamson, T. Wickham and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Renee Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Nev. Dept. Corr. et al
as 3:2018cv00339
Defendant:
R Donnelly, Hometown Healthcare, Brian and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Agostino v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00337
Defendant:
Brian Sandoval, Dr. Marks, Melissa Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Frank S. D'Agostino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patino v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00241
Defendant:
R Donnelly, Nancy, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Tulio F. Patino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frimmel v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00144
Defendant:
Kim Alan Adamson, Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Frimmel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNamara v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00122
Defendant:
Adamson, Aranas, Dr. Donnelly and others
Plaintiff:
McNamara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2018cv00069
Defendant:
Aranas, Dr. Donnelly, Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ross Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Branigan v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00024
Defendant:
Dr. Kim Adamson, Dr. Romeo Aranas, Tara Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Kimball D. Branigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gadsden v. Donnelly et al
as 3:2017cv00728
Defendant:
Renee Baker, James Donnelly, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Chioke Gadsden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOT USED
as 2:2017cv03091
Defendant:
Renee Baker, James Donnelly, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Chioke Gadsden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
