Cases 41 - 50 of 69
ARNOLD v. MEISEL et al
as 5:2013cv02157
Plaintiff:
MARC ANTHONY JAMES ARNOLD
Defendant:
DALE MEISEL, EDWARD SWEENEY, CINDY EQIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2012cv05984
Plaintiff:
ERROL T. WILEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and DETECTIVE DAILY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNYDER et al v. DAILY GROMMET, INC.
as 2:2012cv04233
Plaintiff:
MARTIN SNYDER and ANN SNYDER
Defendant:
DAILY GROMMET, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SNYDER et al v. DAILY GROMMET, INC.
as 2:2012cv02579
Plaintiff:
MARTIN SNYDER and ANN SNYDER
Defendant:
DAILY GROMMET, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 1:2012cv00496
Defendant:
Timothy F. Geithner, Nancy D. Hogan, Bureau of Labor Statistics and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHAMBERS v. PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER et al
as 2:2011cv06589
Plaintiff:
JERRY ARMOND CHAMBERS, SR.
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS and SOUTH PHILLY REVIEW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63626
Plaintiff:
DELBERT SCOTT and LORENE DAILY
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAILY v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01804
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAILY
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC. , WYETH SPECIAL TRANSACTION SEVERANCE PLAN and HUMAN RESOURCES, BENEFITS AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF WYETH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
FREEMAN v. PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS
as 2:2010cv06091
Plaintiff:
BARRY FREEMAN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
