Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Sandy v. Martuscello
as 19-2185
Respondent / Appellee:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr., Superintendent, Coxsackie Correctional Facility
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kester Andre Sandy
Morrow v. Vanderwerff et al
as 9:2019cv00555
Defendant:
Barbara Ost, Daniel F. Martuscello, III, Thomas Tanea and others
Plaintiff:
Neb Morrow, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Dahkle
as 19-650
Defendant / Appellee:
E. Coon, Correction Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, T. Dahkle, Correction Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, J. Iarrusso, O.R.C./Inmate Counselor, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Taheen Hayes
Sankara v. Martuscello
as 1:2018cv06308
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Petitioner:
Ahmadou Sankara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sankara v. Martuscello
as 9:2018cv00699
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Petitioner:
Ahmadou Sankara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patel v. Martuscello
as 18-1317
Petitioner - Appellant:
Vinod Patel
Respondent - Appellee:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
O'Daniel v. Martuscello
as 18-894
Petitioner - Appellant:
William O'Daniel, 11-A-1440, Coxsackie Correctional Facility P.O. Box 999, Coxsackie, NY 12051
Respondent - Appellee:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the Coxsackie Correctional Facility, New York State Department of Correctional Services
Braxton v. Bruen et al
as 9:2017cv01346
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Braxton
Defendant:
Kevin Bruen, Jeff McKoy, Joseph Belinier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Martuscello
as 9:2017cv01199
Petitioner:
Arnold Bryant
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Annucci et al
as 9:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
William D. Thomas
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Ann Marie T. Sullivan, Carl J. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
