Cases 41 - 50 of 236
Edward Burley v. Thomas Cooley, et al
as 16-1471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD DONALD BURLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS COOLEY, Dentist, THOMAS ANDERSON, Dentist, STEVEN FLETCHER, Dentist and others
Troby Benson v. Byron Osborn, et al
as 16-1439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROBY BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BYRON OSBORN, Correctional Officer and DAN DURANT, Hearing Investigator
Defendant:
MIKE MCLEAN, Step I Grievance Coordinator, TERRI SWIFT, Resident Unit Manager, RICHARD STAPLETON, Administrator / Hearings Administrator and others
Joseph Dunbar v. John Prelesnik, et al
as 16-1374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH GREGORY DUNBAR
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PRELESNIK, Warden, CATHLEEN STODDARD, acting warden and DANIEL H. HEYNS, .
Webster #191109 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Joseph Webster #191109
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Mary Berghuis and B. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #221217 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams #221217
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Health Services, Bureau of Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rickey Bills v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 16-1253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKEY BILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, MDOC Director, LEWIS, Adrian Correctional Facility, Property Room Supervisor, CONDON, ARF Acting RUM/Hearing Officer and others
Michael Kitchen v. Daniel Heyn
as 16-1243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANDREW KITCHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, et al
Joseph Dunbar v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 16-1110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH GREGORY DUNBAR
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director, DEWAYNE BURTON, Warden, ROZEN, Counselor and others
Tonny Horne v. Daniel Heyn
as 16-1114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONNY HORNE
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Doctor, MDOC
Raleem v. Brown et al
as 1:2016cv10305
Plaintiff:
Raleem
Defendant:
Larry L. Brown, T. Lee, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
