Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Clark v. Delta Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2010cv00417
Plaintiff:
Percy Clark
Defendant:
Delta Correctional Facility, Danny Scott and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Scott et al
as 4:2010cv00058
Petitioner:
Daryl Morris
Respondent:
Danny Scott and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armon Randall v. Danny Scott, et al
as 10-60283
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARMON ANDRE RANDALL
Respondent - Appellee:
DANNY SCOTT, Warden and DELTA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Dismuke v. Scott et al
as 1:2010cv00072
Petitioner:
Lee Dismuke
Respondent:
Danny Scott and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ames v. Scott et al
as 1:2010cv00048
Petitioner:
Tony Ames
Respondent:
Danny Scott and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris-Bey v. Scott et al
as 4:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
Carlton Harris-Bey
Defendant:
Danny Scott, Micheal Beckum, P. Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seals v. Scott et al
as 4:2010cv00013
Plaintiff:
Richard Tyrone Seals
Defendant:
Danny Scott, Reggie Ward and S. Maggett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HURDT et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv90831
Plaintiff:
DANNY SCOTT HURDT and FREIDA A. HURDT
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Baskin v. Scott
as 3:2009cv00551
Plaintiff:
Keith Baskin
Defendant:
Danny Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Epps et al
as 3:2009cv00544
Plaintiff:
Montrell Jordan
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Danny Scott and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
