Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Chege et al v. Beck et al
as 4:2014cv00004
Plaintiff: David M Chege and Esther Chege
Defendant: Brian M Beck and Ariens Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC. v. FISHBURN
as 1:2013cv01644
Defendant: TIMOTHY H. FISHBURN and DAVID M. RICKELMAN
Plaintiff: JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
United States of America v. Nowak
as 3:2013cv01100
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: David M Nowak
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
HOCKETT et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01252
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: DAVID M HOCKETT and JUDY A HOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Rollins et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00754
Plaintiff: David M Rollins and Rose Rollins
Defendant: Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00212
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff: DAVID M. JOHNSON
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
IN RE: DAVID M. HAAS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013mc00030
Petitioner: DAVID M. HAAS
Respondent: U.S. DISTRICT COURT
LIVINGSTON v. CARAWAY
as 2:2013cv00050
Respondent: JOHN F. CARAWAY
Petitioner: DAVID M. LIVINGSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01842
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00311
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?