Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Khan v. Northwest Detention Center et al
as 3:2009cv05646
Plaintiff:
Izaz E Khan
Defendant:
Northwest Detention Center and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Takyi v. Warden, Northwest Detention Center
as 3:2009cv05383
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Takyi
Defendant:
Warden, Northwest Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stelya v. Napolitano et al
as 2:2009cv00660
Petitioner:
Yelena Yuryevna Stelya
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano, Eric H Holder, Jr, A Neil Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Macavilca v. Northwest Detention Center Warden
as 3:2008cv05637
Plaintiff:
Domingo German Macavilca
Defendant:
Northwest Detention Center Warden
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gokce v. Correctional Service Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00722
Plaintiff:
Irfan Gokce
Defendant:
Correctional Service Corporation, Federal Detention Center Sea-Tac, Forks City Jail and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Doissaint v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2008cv00584
Petitioner:
Volsaint Doissaint
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Johnson v. Rahr et al
as 2:2008cv00311
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Sue Rahr, Unnamed Deputy Sheriff #1, Unnamed Deputy Sheriff #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. King County Adult & Juvenile Detention Center et al
as 2:2008cv00175
Petitioner:
Kevin G Johnson
Respondent:
King County Adult & Juvenile Detention Center and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carey v. Carlson et al
as 2:2007cv00051
Plaintiff:
Reginald Jerome Carey
Defendant:
L Jones, Theron D McCain, Thanh Khuu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
