Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Chapman v. Bullock et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00463
Plaintiff: Louis Roy Chapman
Defendant: Bullock, D. Newcomer, John Bendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. Dillman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00232
Petitioner: Dennis A. McClain
Respondent: Jeffrey N. Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roulhac v. Dillman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00211
Petitioner: Clarence Roulhac, Jr.
Defendant: Jeffrey N. Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roulhac v. McDonnell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00848
Plaintiff: Clarence Roulhac, Jr.
Defendant: R. McDonnell, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henley v. Dillman
as 1:2013cv01437
Petitioner: Holman B. Henley, Jr.
Respondent: Jeffrey N. Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murray v. Dillman
as 1:2013cv01261
Petitioner: Kenneth Murray
Respondent: Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doxie, III v. Dillman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00505
Petitioner: Aaron Doxie, III
Respondent: Jeffrey N. Dillman and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Dillman
as 1:2013cv00924
Petitioner: Bryant Lee Brown
Respondent: Jeffrey N. Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saunders-El v. Dillman
as 1:2013cv00878
Petitioner: Antonio J Saunders-El
Respondent: Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henley v. Dillman
as 1:2013cv00877
Petitioner: Holman B. Henley, Jr.
Respondent: Jeffrey N. Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?