Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 41 - 50 of 125
GARNER v. ALPHARETTA GEORGIA et al
as 5:2017mc00003
Plaintiff: VALENCIA RENA GARNER RESTRICTED - CHECK FILER STATUS
Defendant: ALPHARETTA GEORGIA, GARY GEORGE, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Melton v. Superior Court of Douglas County et al
as 1:2017cv01913
Petitioner: Shannon D. Melton
Respondent: Superior Court of Douglas County, State of Georgia, Douglas County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Pruitt v. Williams et al
as 1:2016cv04604
Petitioner: Leslie Sean Pruitt
Respondent: Doug Williams, Etowah Sheriff's Department, Alabama, Georgia Governor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cook v. Emerson et al
as 1:2016cv03571
Plaintiff: Marvin Douglas Cook, Jr.
Defendant: David T. Emerson, District Attorney's Office and Douglas County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. A portion of that Right of Way for a Railroad situated in Land Lot 216 of the 3rd District of Carroll County, Georgia, et al
as 1:2016cv03536
Plaintiff: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant: A portion of that Right of Way for a Railroad situated in Land Lot 216 of the 3rd District of Carroll County, Georgia, A portion of that Right of Way for a railroad situated in Land lots 172, 173 and 174 of the 2nd District and 5th Section of Douglas County, Georgia, A portion of that Right of Way for a railroad situated in Land lots 172 and 173 of the 2nd District and 5th Section of Douglas County, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. 7.70 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lot 172 of the 2nd District, 5th Section of Douglas County, Georgia and more particularly described herein et al
as 1:2016cv03371
Plaintiff: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant: 7.70 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lot 172 of the 2nd District, 5th Section of Douglas County, Georgia and more particularly described herein and Unknown Owners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. 2.44 acres, more or less, over parcel(s) of land of approximately 36.68 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lot 192 of the 3rd Land District, 5th Section of Douglas County, Georgia and more particul et al
as 1:2016cv03255
Plaintiff: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant: 2.44 acres, more or less, over parcel(s) of land of approximately 36.68 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lot 192 of the 3rd Land District, 5th Section of Douglas County, Georgia, Brian Hill, Tracy Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. .19 acres, more or less, over the following parcel(s) of land et al
as 1:2016cv03252
Plaintiff: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant: .19 acres, more or less, over the following parcel(s) of land, Approximately 7.795 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lot 245, 2"d District, 51h Section, of Douglas County, Georgia and in Land Lot 674, 1st District, 3rd Section, of Paulding County, Approximately 1.098 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lot 245, 2nd District, 5th Section, of Douglas County, Georgia and in Land Lot 674, 1st District, 3rd Section, of Paulding County and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Estate of James Williams et al v. Douglas County et al
as 1:2016cv02913
Plaintiff: Estate of James Williams , Asasa Rasheed Williams , Farod Williams and others
Defendant: Douglas County , Douglas County Sheriffs Office , Douglas County Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Superior Court of Douglas County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02615
Plaintiff: Tommy Pearson
Defendant: Superior Court of Douglas County, State of Georgia and DA McDay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?