Cases 41 - 50 of 63
E&S Ring Management Corporation v. Card
as 2:2016cv03043
Plaintiff:
E&S Ring Management Corporation
Defendant:
Darnell Lamont Card
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Clark v. Amtrust North America et al
as 3:2016cv05561
Plaintiff:
Jeannine Clark
Defendant:
Amtrust North America and AmTrust E&S Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Malloy et al v. County of Santa Cruz
as 5:2016cv05135
Plaintiff:
Malloy, Michael Malloy, Ami Malloy and others
Defendant:
County of Santa Cruz, City of Scotts Valley, Officer Michael Birly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. UNITED AFRICAN-ASIAN ABILITIES CLUB et al
as 2:2016cv02913
Defendant:
E & S RING MANAGEMENT CORP., UNITED AFRICAN-ASIAN ABILITIES CLUB, WESTGATE BARRINGTON COMPANY and others
Adrian Moon et al v. Kimberly Seibel et al
as 5:2016cv00009
Defendant:
H Aguliar, H Aguliar, Al B Allal and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Medina, Adrian Moon and Johnny Potter
Foster Sarpong et al v. Related Management Company, L.P. et al
as 2:2013cv08817
Defendant:
Does, Patricia Kitahara, Parkside Place Family Apartments and others
Plaintiff:
A. S., D. S., E. S. and others
E.S., et al. v. County of Tulare, et al.
as 1:2013cv01697
Plaintiff:
E. S. , J.F. and Maria Moreno
Defendant:
County of Tulare and City of Visalia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
E & S Ring Management Corporation v. Estela Pruce et al
as 2:2013cv06808
Defendant:
Does and Estela Pruce
Plaintiff:
E & S Ring Management Corporation
Souza v. Great American Insurance Company et al
as 3:2013cv03361
Plaintiff:
Manuel Souza
Defendant:
Great American E & S Insurance Company, H + H - DMS Joint Venture, H + H Builders, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Ever Win International Corporation v. E S I Cases and Accessories Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02601
Defendant:
Does and E S I Cases and Accessories Inc
Plaintiff:
Ever Win International Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
