Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 28,338
Oleksandr Klym-Stadnyk v. Loretta E. Lynch
as 15-3423
Petitioner: OLEKSANDR KLYM-STADNYK
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1863
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hair Rodriguez-Molinero v. Loretta E. Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1860
Petitioner: HAIR RODRIGUEZ-MOLINERO
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Mengistab Haile v. Loretta Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1405
Petitioner: MENGISTAB ASMELASH HAILE
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Guillermo Coto-Rivas v. Loretta E. Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1806
Petitioner: Guillermo Coto-Rivas
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
Milana Fisenko v. Loretta Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3418
Petitioner: MILANA ARTASHESTOVNA FISENKO
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Elias Al Fakhouri v. Loretta E. Lynch
as 15-3416
Petitioner: ELIAS NAEL AL FAKHOURI
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Carlos Lopez Hernandez v. Ed Prindle, et al
as 15-5390
Petitioner - Appellant: CARLOS ALBERTO LOPEZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee: ED PRINDLE, Jailer, Boone County Jail, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, SYLVIA BONACCORSI-MANO, Chicago Assistant Field Office Director Detention and Removal Operations and others
S.A.B. v. Loretta E. Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1834
Petitioner: S.A.B.
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Tao Chen v. Loretta E. Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1831
Petitioner: TAO CHEN
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?