Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09519
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Eastman Kodak Company v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06849
Plaintiff:
Eastman Kodak Company
Defendant:
The Goldman Sachs Group Inc, Metro International Trade Services L.L.C., JP Morgan Chase & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437 Federal Election Commission
Kohler Ronan, LLC v. Perkins Eastman Architects, D.P.C.
as 7:2014cv06432
Plaintiff:
Kohler Ronan, LLC
Defendant:
Perkins Eastman Architects, D.P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eastman Kodak Company v. THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. et al
as 6:2014cv06429
Plaintiff:
Eastman Kodak Company
Defendant:
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., METRO INTERNATIONAL TRADE SERVICES LLC, JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Boles v. Eastman Kodak Company
as 6:2014cv06243
Defendant:
Eastman Kodak Company
Plaintiff:
Mildred Boles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02952
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Flemming v. Adam et al
as 9:2014cv00395
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Richard Adam, David Rock, Nancy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02192
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01473
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01404
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
