Cases 41 - 50 of 594
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 1:2023cv05881
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ellis et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05944
Plaintiff:
Edward Ellis and Valerie Ellis
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc., Exactech U.S., Inc., TPG, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Minzer v. PDC Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06506
Plaintiff:
Shoshana Minzer
Defendant:
PDC Energy, Inc., Barton R. Brookman, Pamela R. Butcher and others
Ellis v. Kim et al
as 1:2023cv05309
Plaintiff:
Erick Ellis
Defendant:
Doctor Kim, Dr. Bentivegna and Correctional Officer Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laskaris v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05461
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Laskaris
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, William F. Austen, Christopher L. Ayers and others
Bushansky v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05167
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, William F. Austen, Christopher L. Ayers and others
Williams v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05235
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, Frederick A. Henderson, William F. Austen and others
Rosenfeld v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05313
Plaintiff:
Zahava Rosenfeld
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, William F. Austen, Christopher L. Ayers and others
O'Dell v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04971
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, Frederick A. Henderson, William F. Austen and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang, Stephen Bushansky, Robert Williams and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
