Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Lindell, Nate et al v. Litscher, Jon et al
as 3:2018cv01021
Defendant:
Dan Winkleski, Mark Kartman, Larry Primmer and others
Plaintiff:
Nate A. Lindell and Dion Mathews
Undetermined:
GBCI Prison Facility and WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher, Adam v. Jess, Cathy et al
as 3:2018cv00944
Defendant:
Brad Hompe, J. Doe 3, J. Doe 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Christopher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shane Robbins v. Brian Foster, et al
as 17-3345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANE T. ROBBINS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN FOSTER, Warden, JAMES OLSON, MICHAEL D. SAUNDERS and others
Werner v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv01457
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Werner
Defendant:
Judy Smith , Jim Zanon, Robert Bacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stimac, William v. Hepp, Randell et al
as 3:2017cv00653
Plaintiff:
William Stimac
Defendant:
Randell Hepp , Sarah Feltes, Jill Schneidervin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borzych v. Litscher et al
as 2:2017cv00762
Plaintiff:
Garry A Borzych
Defendant:
Jon Litscher , Brian Foster, Phil Kingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Hankins et al
as 4:2016cv04211
Plaintiff:
Gary L Mayfield
Defendant:
Joseph P Hankins, Andrea Cobb, James Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darreyll Thomas v. William Griesbach
as 16-3228
Petitioner:
DARREYLL T. THOMAS
Respondent:
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH
Party-in-Interest:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LARSEN, KELLY SALINAS, ROBERT HUMPHREYS, Warden and others
Thomas v. Larsen et al
as 1:2016cv00562
Plaintiff:
Darreyll T Thomas
Defendant:
CO Larsen, Kelly Salinas, Robert Humphreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Powers v. James Clayton, et al
as 15-3509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES C. CLAYTON, Investigator also known as CHRIS CLAYTON, PAUL MANN, DHS/TDF Security Officer, EMILY DAVIDSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
