Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Esparza v. Dart, et al
as 1:2012cv07909
Plaintiff:
Bulmaro Esparza
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunlap et al v. Harvey et al
as 1:2011cv07331
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dunlap and Brian McCray
Defendant:
City of Harvey, Illinois , J. Sinnott , S. Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson et al v. Bayer Pharma AG et al
as 3:2011cv12271
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Nelson , Sonia Esparza , Kristina Scott and others
Defendant:
Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Searcy v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv00432
Plaintiff:
Adrian Searcy
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Carlos Ortiz (#17530) , Salvador Esparza (#11040) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Esparza et al v. Naquin Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01720
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Esparza and Mayra Hernandez
Defendant:
Naquin Enterprises, Inc., John Naquin and Lee Naquin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Esparza v. Smith et al
as 1:2009cv07498
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Esparza
Defendant:
C. Smith, J. Mueller, Earl Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Keel v. Esparza et al
as 1:2009cv05841
Plaintiff:
Darnell Keel
Defendant:
J Esparza, Jimmy Brooks, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Esparza v. Donald J. Lally, Jr., Ray H.K. Scodeller, and Randall S. Miller & Associates, P.C.
as 1:2008cv05940
Plaintiff:
Israel Esparza and Israel Esparza
Defendant:
Randall S. Miller & Associates, P.C., Donald J. Lally, Jr. and Ray H.K. Scodeller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
