Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Jamison v. FCI Memphis et al
as 2:2015cv02395
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison
Defendant:
FCI Memphis, FCI Medical Department, Warden Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hopper v. Talladega FCI
as 1:2015cv01031
Petitioner:
Richard Hopper
Respondent:
W. Taylor, Warden Talladega FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Consolidated Foods v. FCI Memphis
as 2:2014cv03006
Plaintiff:
Consolidated Foods
Defendant:
FCI Memphis
Miscellaneou:
Edward L. Stanton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bradford v. Matthew W. Mellady- Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2014cv02031
Plaintiff:
Don Montrail Bradford
Defendant:
Matthew W. Mellady- Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Glimer, Blanche B. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamison v. U.S. of America et al
as 2:2014cv02795
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison
Defendant:
U.S. of America, FCI Memphis, Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Todd et al v. Stephens et al
as 2:2014cv02093
Plaintiff:
Edward Bradley
Defendant:
FCI Memphis Warden D.R. Stephens, Kessel, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Todd et al v. Stephens et al
as 2:2014cv02050
Plaintiff:
Xavier S. Todd
Defendant:
FCI Memphis Warden D.R. Stephens, Kessel, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sewraz v. Warden FCI Memphis
as 2:2013cv02634
Petitioner:
Chetanand Sewraz
Respondent:
Warden FCI Memphis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bernadel v. Stephens et al
as 2:2013cv02410
Plaintiff:
Mario Gerard Bernadel
Defendant:
D.R. Stephens, FCI - Memphis, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Burgess v. F.B.O.P. et al
as 2:2013cv02007
Plaintiff:
Corey Burgess
Defendant:
FBOP, Department of Justice, DSCC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
