Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Young v. Taylor
as 0:2014cv03457
Petitioner:
Fernando Francisco Young
Respondent:
Edsel T. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jorge-Salgado v. Atkins et al
as 2:2014cv00186
Petitioner:
Francisco Jorge-Salgado
Respondent:
Kenny Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Rio Chico Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02972
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Rio Chico Inc, Raul Salazar, Ochoa Federico and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv02825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Kenny Ray Cabbagestalk v. Francisco Quintana
as 1:2010cv02208
Petitioner:
Kenny Ray Cabbagestalk
Respondent:
Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Naranjo v. County of Richland et al
as 3:2010cv02041
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Naranjo
Respondent:
County of Richland and April Woodar Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Naranjo v. Reynolds
as 3:2009cv03238
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Naranjo
Respondent:
Cecilia Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blandin et al v. House of Raeford Farms Inc
as 6:2009cv03137
Plaintiff:
Tawana Blandin, Teresa Calixto, Elodia Carrera and others
Defendant:
House of Raeford Farms Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
NGM Insurance Company v. Framers Unlimited Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01030
Plaintiff:
NGM Insurance Company and NGM Insurance Company
Defendant:
Framers Unlimited Inc, Jonise Kelvin, Francisco Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Cleofas v. State of South Carolina
as 3:2008cv02861
Petitioner:
Luis Francisco Cleofas
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
