Cases 41 - 50 of 117
BERRY v. S. FITZGERALD et al
as 1:2017cv04904
Plaintiff:
LARRY LAVONNE BERRY
Defendant:
S. FITZGERALD and OFFICER WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ghormley et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv03944
Plaintiff:
Kerry Ghormley , Yvette Alvarez-Perez , Patricia Austin and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lagrone et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv02398
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lagrone , Francis Cerniglia , Vladislav Black and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. HALL et al
as 1:2015cv07887
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
E. HALL, MARCHANELLO, BITENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FITZGERALD v. VIGGINANO et al
as 2:2015cv07773
Plaintiff:
MERVIN R. FITZGERALD
Defendant:
DAVID KOTHER, GRACE H. PARKS and P. DEROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FITZGERALD v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv06631
Plaintiff:
DAVID FITZGERALD
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
