Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Wells v. Nooth et al
as 2:2016cv00758
Defendant:
Judy Gilmore and Mark Nooth
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00589
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wells v. Nass et al
as 2:2016cv00582
Defendant:
Roybn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremiah v. Nooth et al
as 2:2016cv00534
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe, John/Jane Doe, Officer Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Jeremiah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 2:2016cv00423
Defendant:
Neil F. Byl, Michael Casey, C. Criswell and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Gilmore
as 2:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Defendant:
J. Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Knight and Betty L Knight
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Mark Nooth, Judy Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2015cv02245
Defendant:
C. Crowell, T. Garner, Judy Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. Hascall et al
as 2:2015cv02098
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Cathy Bryant-Kaae, Timothy Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halsey v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2015cv02004
S.R.C.I:
Chaplain T. Armstrong, C/O Doherty and Superintendent J. Gilmore
Plaintiff:
Jacobe Halsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
