Cases 41 - 50 of 409
Aecom Energy & Construction, Inc. v. Topolewski et al.
as 2:2022ms00027
Plaintiff:
AECOM ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
Gary Topolewski, John Ripley, Todd Hale and others
Coletto et al v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Terry Ann Coletto and Gary Archambeault
Defendant:
Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Johnson v. Hoover et al
as 3:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Defendant:
Laurie Hoover, Michaela Garufalo, Ed Gary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Woodbury
as 3:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Sean Maurice Dean
Defendant:
Gary Woodbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chambers v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2022cv00097
Petitioner:
Gary Chambers
Respondent:
State of Nevada and Attorney General State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pena v. Loya Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv02216
Plaintiff:
Gary Pena
Defendant:
Loya Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diaz-Castro v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Christopher Diaz-Castro
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonham v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01833
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Bonham
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Steve Sisolak, Barbara K. Cegavske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonham v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01879
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Bonham
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Steve Sisolak, Barbara K. Cegavske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AECOM Energy and Construction Inc v. Ripley
as 2:2021ms00121
Plaintiff:
AECOM Energy and Construction Inc
Defendant:
John Ripley and Gary Topolewski
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
