Cases 41 - 50 of 163
Bacon v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2018cv00319
Plaintiff:
Percy Lavae Bacon
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, James Cox, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2018cv00294
Defendant:
Dr Romero Aranas, Byrne, S Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Gentry et al
as 2:2018cv00266
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Alfred Christopher Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palovich v. Gentry
as 2:2018cv00240
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Joseph Palovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard v. Gentry et al
as 2:2018cv00181
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Marvin D Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Adams et al
as 2:2018cv00134
Defendant:
Minor Adams, Mike Byrne and Jo Gentry
Plaintiff:
Francis Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Gentry et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Jorge Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shields v. Baker et al
as 3:2018cv00031
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Dwayne Baze, Kelly Belanger and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houe v. Gentry
as 2:2017cv03093
Respondent:
Warden Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Raymond Houe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Bannister et al
as 2:2017cv03079
Defendant:
Robert Bannister, Sonya Carrillo and Jo Gentry
Plaintiff:
Leroy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
