Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 54
O'Neill v. Tapia et al
as 1:2008cv00473
Plaintiff: Daniel Patrick O'Neill
Defendant: George Tapia and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armijo v. Tapia, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-2095
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY T. ARMIJO
Respondent - Appellee: GEORGE TAPIA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Mascarenas v. Tapia et al
as 1:2007cv01253
Plaintiff: Samuel Mascarenas
Defendant: George Tapia and Joe R Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Williams, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2283
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT GENE ROSS
Defendant - Appellee: JOE WILLIAMS, Director, N.M. Correction Department and GEORGE TAPIA, Warden, Western N.M. Correctional Facility
Reyes v. Tapia
as 1:2007cv01213
Plaintiff: Mark Reyes
Defendant: George Tapia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes v. Tapia
as 6:2007cv01213
Plaintiff: Mark Reyes
Defendant: George Tapia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kavel v. Tapia, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2275
Petitioner - Appellant: MAURECE KAVEL
Respondent - Appellee: GEORGE TAPIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Mascarenas v. Tapia et al
as 1:2007cv00775
Plaintiff: Samuel Mascarenas
Defendant: George Tapia and Joe R Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mascarenas v. Tapia et al
as 6:2007cv00775
Plaintiff: Samuel Mascarenas
Defendant: George Tapia and Joe R Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kavel v. Tapia et al
as 6:2007cv00508
Plaintiff: Maurece Kavel
Defendant: George Tapia and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?